Introduction
The pressure, temperature and time (P-T-t) path experienced by a metamorphic terrane provides significant information about metamorphic processes and the dynamics of orogenic systems. Building these P-T-t paths however, is not a trivial task and requires a full understanding of the mineralogical and textural relationships preserved within the rocks. In this study we show an example where likely mineral misidentification led to errors in inferences about both P-T-t trajectory and tectonic scenario.
In the central Musgrave Block, central Australia, Maboko et al. (1991) and Ellis and Maboko (1992) reconstructed a P-T-t path that invoked changing physicochemical conditions during one metamorphic episode at ~1200 Ma to account for the textures preserved in granulites, and involved the following sequence of events.
(M1) Granulite-facies metamorphism at ~40 km depth and 850-900°C,
(M2) isobaric cooling and deformation of the granulites to form eclogite,
(M3-M4) rapid tectonically driven exhumation, with little cooling of the lower part of the thickened crust to a depth of 15-20 km at ~1190 Ma, and
(M5) deformation and metamorphism at greenschist- to lower amphibolite-facies during the Petermann Orogeny (~550 Ma) after a residence period of ~640 Ma in the mid-crust with a total exhumation of only 2-7 km in the interval between M4 and M5.
The tectonic mechanism envisaged to produce rapid exhumation in the time interval between M1 to M4 (<20 Ma), involved extensional unroofing, along normal faults that lie outside the immediate area.
A problem with this P-T-t trajectory is that mafic dykes as young as ~840 Ma (Zhao and McCulloch, 1993) are deformed by the eclogite-facies overprint (Camacho et al., 1997) indicating that the metamorphic and deformational textures developed between M2 to M4 needed re-evaluation.